From b881dcfbf7fd89b2be801843b060b9ad77cc77e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Borntraeger Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:46:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] s390/head.s: use zero as address for stfl The architecture suggests to use address 0 as parameter for stfl, to allow for future extensions. Using __LC_STFL_FAC_LIST (0x200) shows which address is used, but might be not future proof. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky --- arch/s390/kernel/head.S | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/head.S b/arch/s390/kernel/head.S index e88d35d74950..d62eee11f0b5 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kernel/head.S +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/head.S @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ ENTRY(startup_kdump) xc __LC_STFL_FAC_LIST(8),__LC_STFL_FAC_LIST #ifndef CONFIG_MARCH_G5 # check capabilities against MARCH_{G5,Z900,Z990,Z9_109,Z10} - .insn s,0xb2b10000,__LC_STFL_FAC_LIST # store facility list + .insn s,0xb2b10000,0 # store facilities @ __LC_STFL_FAC_LIST tm __LC_STFL_FAC_LIST,0x01 # stfle available ? jz 0f la %r0,1 -- 2.39.2