From b8867164f05791a6b5363bd51c1274e03600886e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhaolei Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:59:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] trace_workqueue: remove cpu_workqueue_stats->first_entry cpu_workqueue_stats->first_entry is useless because we can retrieve the header of a cpu workqueue using: if (&cpu_workqueue_stats->list == workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list.next) [ Impact: cleanup ] Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Tom Zanussi Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker --- kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c index 128b64b93f1..890974aed64 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c @@ -16,8 +16,6 @@ /* A cpu workqueue thread */ struct cpu_workqueue_stats { struct list_head list; -/* Useful to know if we print the cpu headers */ - bool first_entry; int cpu; pid_t pid; /* Can be inserted from interrupt or user context, need to be atomic */ @@ -103,8 +101,6 @@ static void probe_workqueue_creation(struct task_struct *wq_thread, int cpu) cws->pid = wq_thread->pid; spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags); - if (list_empty(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list)) - cws->first_entry = true; list_add_tail(&cws->list, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags); } -- 2.39.2