From c295fc05789653ef24f296299df7c5f92fe74dce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikanth Karthikesan Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:40:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] block: Allow changing max_sectors_kb above the default 512 The patch "block: Use accessor functions for queue limits" (ae03bf639a5027d27270123f5f6e3ee6a412781d) changed queue_max_sectors_store() to use blk_queue_max_sectors() instead of directly assigning the value. But blk_queue_max_sectors() differs a bit 1. It sets both max_sectors_kb, and max_hw_sectors_kb 2. Never allows one to change max_sectors_kb above BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS. If one specifies a value greater then max_hw_sectors is set to that value but max_sectors is set to BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS I am not sure whether blk_queue_max_sectors() should be changed, as it seems to be that way for a long time. And there may be callers dependent on that behaviour. This patch simply reverts to the older way of directly assigning the value to max_sectors as it was before. Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/blk-sysfs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c index 418d63619680..d3aa2aadb3e0 100644 --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ queue_max_sectors_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page, size_t count) return -EINVAL; spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock); - blk_queue_max_sectors(q, max_sectors_kb << 1); + q->limits.max_sectors = max_sectors_kb << 1; spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock); return ret; -- 2.39.5