From c8e84d2f9bc0021200a11721df0dc987d6191193 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Engestrom Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:37:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: x86: fix spelling mistakes Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/x86/intel_mpx.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/x86/intel_mpx.txt b/Documentation/x86/intel_mpx.txt index 818518a3ff01..1a5a12184a35 100644 --- a/Documentation/x86/intel_mpx.txt +++ b/Documentation/x86/intel_mpx.txt @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ A: MPX-enabled application will possibly create a lot of bounds tables in If we were to preallocate them for the 128TB of user virtual address space, we would need to reserve 512TB+2GB, which is larger than the entire virtual address space today. This means they can not be reserved - ahead of time. Also, a single process's pre-popualated bounds directory + ahead of time. Also, a single process's pre-populated bounds directory consumes 2GB of virtual *AND* physical memory. IOW, it's completely infeasible to prepopulate bounds directories. @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ A: This would work if we could hook the site of each and every memory these calls. Q: Could a bounds fault be handed to userspace and the tables allocated - there in a signal handler intead of in the kernel? + there in a signal handler instead of in the kernel? A: mmap() is not on the list of safe async handler functions and even if mmap() would work it still requires locking or nasty tricks to keep track of the allocation state there. -- 2.39.5