From cba8244a0f1c277b6b1e48ed6504fa434119e24d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:04:01 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Add debug check for too many rcu_read_unlock() TREE_PREEMPT_RCU maintains an rcu_read_lock_nesting counter in the task structure, which happens to be a signed int. So this patch adds a check for this counter being negative at the end of __rcu_read_unlock(). This check is under CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, so can be thought of as being part of lockdep. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com Cc: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: dhowells@redhat.com LKML-Reference: <12626498423064-git-send-email-> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h index f11ebd44b454..e77cdf321e13 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h @@ -304,6 +304,9 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void) if (--ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting) == 0 && unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special))) rcu_read_unlock_special(t); +#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING + WARN_ON_ONCE(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting) < 0); +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */ } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_unlock); -- 2.39.5