From d1b00a4711d5b953b13ccc859bc30c447c96860e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Satoru Takeuchi Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:07:48 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: use IS_ALIGNED() for assertion in btrfs_lookup_csums_range() for simplicity btrfs_lookup_csums_range() uses ALIGN() to check if "start" and "end + 1" are aligned to "root->sectorsize". It's better to replace these with IS_ALIGNED() for simplicity. Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c index 991f056acab2..6e6262eca8b7 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c @@ -329,8 +329,8 @@ int btrfs_lookup_csums_range(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 start, u64 end, u64 csum_end; u16 csum_size = btrfs_super_csum_size(root->fs_info->super_copy); - ASSERT(start == ALIGN(start, root->sectorsize) && - (end + 1) == ALIGN(end + 1, root->sectorsize)); + ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(start, root->sectorsize) && + IS_ALIGNED(end + 1, root->sectorsize)); path = btrfs_alloc_path(); if (!path) -- 2.39.5