From d5669f7b9b0344a7f1e874ac86b9403434381ba8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaegeuk Kim Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:37:39 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid to trigger writepage during POR This patch doesn't make any effect on previous behavior, since f2fs_write_data_page bypasses writing the page during POR. But, the difference is that this patch avoids holding writepages mutex. This is to avoid the following false warning, since this can happen only when mount and shutdown are triggered at the same time. ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 4.0.0-rc1+ #3 Tainted: G O ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/u8:0/2270 is trying to acquire lock: (&sbi->gc_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [] f2fs_balance_fs+0x73/0x90 [f2fs] but task is already holding lock: (&sbi->writepages){+.+...}, at: [] f2fs_write_data_pages+0xcb/0x3a0 [f2fs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&sbi->writepages){+.+...}: [] lock_acquire+0xe1/0x2f0 [] mutex_lock_nested+0x63/0x530 [] f2fs_write_data_pages+0xcb/0x3a0 [f2fs] [] do_writepages+0x21/0x50 [] __writeback_single_inode+0x76/0xbf0 [] writeback_single_inode+0xea/0x1c0 [] write_inode_now+0x95/0xa0 [] iput+0x20b/0x3f0 [] recover_data.constprop.14+0x26b/0xa80 [f2fs] [] recover_fsync_data+0x2b6/0x5e0 [f2fs] [] f2fs_fill_super+0xb24/0xb90 [f2fs] [] mount_bdev+0x1a4/0x1e0 [] f2fs_mount+0x15/0x20 [f2fs] [] mount_fs+0x39/0x180 [] vfs_kern_mount+0x6b/0x160 [] do_mount+0x204/0xbe0 [] SyS_mount+0x8b/0xe0 [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b -> #1 (&sbi->cp_mutex){+.+...}: [] lock_acquire+0xe1/0x2f0 [] mutex_lock_nested+0x63/0x530 [] write_checkpoint+0x42/0x1230 [f2fs] [] f2fs_sync_fs+0x9d/0x2a0 [f2fs] [] sync_filesystem+0x82/0xb0 [] generic_shutdown_super+0x34/0x100 [] kill_block_super+0x27/0x70 [] kill_f2fs_super+0x20/0x30 [f2fs] [] deactivate_locked_super+0x49/0x80 [] deactivate_super+0x4e/0x70 [] cleanup_mnt+0x43/0x90 [] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20 [] task_work_run+0xc4/0xf0 [] do_notify_resume+0x8d/0xa0 [] int_signal+0x12/0x17 -> #0 (&sbi->gc_mutex){+.+.+.}: [] __lock_acquire+0x1ac6/0x1c90 [] lock_acquire+0xe1/0x2f0 [] mutex_lock_nested+0x63/0x530 [] f2fs_balance_fs+0x73/0x90 [f2fs] [] f2fs_write_data_page+0x348/0x5b0 [f2fs] [] __f2fs_writepage+0x1a/0x50 [f2fs] [] write_cache_pages+0x274/0x6f0 [] f2fs_write_data_pages+0xe0/0x3a0 [f2fs] [] do_writepages+0x21/0x50 [] __writeback_single_inode+0x76/0xbf0 [] writeback_sb_inodes+0x32a/0x710 [] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x9f/0xd0 [] wb_writeback+0x3db/0x850 [] bdi_writeback_workfn+0x148/0x980 [] process_one_work+0x1e2/0x840 [] worker_thread+0x121/0x460 [] kthread+0xf8/0x110 [] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/data.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c index 389fda772e69..0057d4baad33 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c @@ -1408,6 +1408,10 @@ static int f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping, available_free_memory(sbi, DIRTY_DENTS)) goto skip_write; + /* during POR, we don't need to trigger writepage at all. */ + if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING))) + goto skip_write; + diff = nr_pages_to_write(sbi, DATA, wbc); if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) { -- 2.39.5