From d8fa9471859d8776a0c02f079d299cdda6070c8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Fleming Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:03:19 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] ia64: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask() As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is pending in the shared queue. Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f ("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked") which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so using this helper function should stop that from happening again. Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Tony Luck Cc: Fenghua Yu Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c | 15 ++------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c index 7bdafc8788bd..7523501d3bc0 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c @@ -201,13 +201,7 @@ ia64_rt_sigreturn (struct sigscratch *scr) goto give_sigsegv; sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE); - - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); - { - current->blocked = set; - recalc_sigpending(); - } - spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); + set_current_blocked(&set); if (restore_sigcontext(sc, scr)) goto give_sigsegv; @@ -427,12 +421,7 @@ handle_signal (unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigse if (!setup_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, scr)) return 0; - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); - sigorsets(¤t->blocked, ¤t->blocked, &ka->sa.sa_mask); - if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) - sigaddset(¤t->blocked, sig); - recalc_sigpending(); - spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); + block_sigmask(ka, sig); /* * Let tracing know that we've done the handler setup. -- 2.39.5