From db6735cab2b0f12a824f04b1d8fb4da2ea978c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Skeggs Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:15:28 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/nve0/fb/gddr5: somewhat better attempt at 100770/10f604/610/614 Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs fb/gddr5/nve0: 100770 is like 10f604 Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs --- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnve0.c | 61 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnve0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnve0.c index 659183b858e2..a4c84d6f50e5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnve0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnve0.c @@ -41,6 +41,14 @@ #include "ramfuc.h" +/* binary driver only executes this path if the condition (a) is true + * for any configuration (combination of rammap+ramcfg+timing) that + * can be reached on a given card. for now, we will execute the branch + * unconditionally in the hope that a "false everywhere" in the bios + * tables doesn't actually mean "don't touch this". + */ +#define NOTE00(a) 1 + struct nve0_ramfuc { struct ramfuc base; @@ -466,23 +474,41 @@ nve0_ram_calc_gddr5(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, u32 freq) ram_mask(fuc, 0x10f2cc, 0xffffffff, nv_ro32(bios, timing + 0x20)); ram_mask(fuc, 0x10f2e8, 0xffffffff, nv_ro32(bios, timing + 0x24)); - /*XXX: what's the condition here? */ - if (1) { - data = (nv_ro08(bios, ramcfg + 0x02) & 0x03) << 8; + data = mask = 0x00000000; + if (NOTE00(ramcfg_02_03 != 0)) { + data |= (nv_ro08(bios, ramcfg + 0x02) & 0x03) << 8; + mask |= 0x00000300; + } + if (NOTE00(ramcfg_01_10)) { if (nv_ro08(bios, ramcfg + 0x01) & 0x10) data |= 0x70000000; - ram_mask(fuc, 0x10f604, 0x70000300, data); + mask |= 0x70000000; + } + ram_mask(fuc, 0x10f604, mask, data); - data = (nv_ro08(bios, timing + 0x30) & 0x07) << 28; + data = mask = 0x00000000; + if (NOTE00(timing_30_07 != 0)) { + data |= (nv_ro08(bios, timing + 0x30) & 0x07) << 28; + mask |= 0x70000000; + } + if (NOTE00(ramcfg_01_01)) { if (nv_ro08(bios, ramcfg + 0x01) & 0x01) data |= 0x00000100; - ram_mask(fuc, 0x10f614, 0x70000000, data); + mask |= 0x00000100; + } + ram_mask(fuc, 0x10f614, mask, data); - data = (nv_ro08(bios, timing + 0x30) & 0x07) << 28; + data = mask = 0x00000000; + if (NOTE00(timing_30_07 != 0)) { + data |= (nv_ro08(bios, timing + 0x30) & 0x07) << 28; + mask |= 0x70000000; + } + if (NOTE00(ramcfg_01_02)) { if (nv_ro08(bios, ramcfg + 0x01) & 0x02) data |= 0x00000100; - ram_mask(fuc, 0x10f610, 0x70000000, data); + mask |= 0x00000100; } + ram_mask(fuc, 0x10f610, mask, data); mask = 0x33f00000; data = 0x00000000; @@ -511,15 +537,22 @@ nve0_ram_calc_gddr5(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, u32 freq) data = nv_ro08(bios, ramcfg + 0x03) & 0x0f; ram_wr32(fuc, 0x10f870, 0x11111111 * data); - data = nv_ro08(bios, ramcfg + 0x02) & 0x03; - if (nv_ro08(bios, ramcfg + 0x01) & 0x10) - data |= 0x00000004; - if ((ram_rd32(fuc, 0x100770) & 0x00000004) != (data & 0x00000004)) { - ram_wr32(fuc, 0x100750, 0x04000009); + data = mask = 0x00000000; + if (NOTE00(ramcfg_02_03 != 0)) { + data |= nv_ro08(bios, ramcfg + 0x02) & 0x03; + mask |= 0x00000003; + } + if (NOTE00(ramcfg_01_10)) { + if (nv_ro08(bios, ramcfg + 0x01) & 0x10) + data |= 0x00000004; + mask |= 0x00000004; + } + + if ((ram_mask(fuc, 0x100770, mask, data) & mask & 4) != (data & 4)) { + ram_mask(fuc, 0x100750, 0x00000008, 0x00000008); ram_wr32(fuc, 0x100710, 0x00000000); ram_wait(fuc, 0x100710, 0x80000000, 0x80000000, 200000); } - ram_mask(fuc, 0x100770, 0x00000007, data); data = (nv_ro08(bios, timing + 0x30) & 0x07) << 8; if (nv_ro08(bios, ramcfg + 0x01) & 0x01) -- 2.39.5