From dd8334a5e17e291f503cada56a0d6aed3ddb3c12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:20:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: fix prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi() calculation commit f0e8faa7a5e894b0fc99d24be1b18685a92ea466 upstream. This function clearly never worked and always returns true, as pointed out by gcc-7: arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c: In function 'prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi': arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c:137:212: error: ?: using integer constants in boolean context, the expression will always evaluate to 'true' [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] With the added braces, the condition actually makes sense. Fixes: 34fe6f107eab ("mfd : Check if the other db8500 core is in WFI") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c index 8538910db202..a970e7fcba9e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c @@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ bool prcmu_pending_irq(void) */ bool prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi(int cpu) { - return readl(PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY) & cpu ? PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI1 : - PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI0; + return readl(PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY) & + (cpu ? PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI1 : PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI0); } /* -- 2.39.5