From e3ad61c64abceeb5cc122f0bde3700e6e17ca60a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ross Zwisler Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:32:12 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] dax: consistent variable naming for DAX entries No functional change. Consistently use the variable name 'entry' instead of 'ret' for DAX radix tree entries. This was already happening in most of the code, so update get_unlocked_mapping_entry(), grab_mapping_entry() and dax_unlock_mapping_entry(). Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner --- fs/dax.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c index 219fa2bd676a..835e7f082cff 100644 --- a/fs/dax.c +++ b/fs/dax.c @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static inline void *unlock_slot(struct address_space *mapping, void **slot) static void *get_unlocked_mapping_entry(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index, void ***slotp) { - void *ret, **slot; + void *entry, **slot; struct wait_exceptional_entry_queue ewait; wait_queue_head_t *wq = dax_entry_waitqueue(mapping, index); @@ -367,13 +367,13 @@ static void *get_unlocked_mapping_entry(struct address_space *mapping, ewait.key.index = index; for (;;) { - ret = __radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, index, NULL, + entry = __radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, index, NULL, &slot); - if (!ret || !radix_tree_exceptional_entry(ret) || + if (!entry || !radix_tree_exceptional_entry(entry) || !slot_locked(mapping, slot)) { if (slotp) *slotp = slot; - return ret; + return entry; } prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wq, &ewait.wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); @@ -396,13 +396,13 @@ static void *get_unlocked_mapping_entry(struct address_space *mapping, */ static void *grab_mapping_entry(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index) { - void *ret, **slot; + void *entry, **slot; restart: spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); - ret = get_unlocked_mapping_entry(mapping, index, &slot); + entry = get_unlocked_mapping_entry(mapping, index, &slot); /* No entry for given index? Make sure radix tree is big enough. */ - if (!ret) { + if (!entry) { int err; spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); @@ -410,10 +410,10 @@ restart: mapping_gfp_mask(mapping) & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM); if (err) return ERR_PTR(err); - ret = (void *)(RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_ENTRY | + entry = (void *)(RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_ENTRY | RADIX_DAX_ENTRY_LOCK); spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); - err = radix_tree_insert(&mapping->page_tree, index, ret); + err = radix_tree_insert(&mapping->page_tree, index, entry); radix_tree_preload_end(); if (err) { spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); @@ -425,11 +425,11 @@ restart: /* Good, we have inserted empty locked entry into the tree. */ mapping->nrexceptional++; spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); - return ret; + return entry; } /* Normal page in radix tree? */ - if (!radix_tree_exceptional_entry(ret)) { - struct page *page = ret; + if (!radix_tree_exceptional_entry(entry)) { + struct page *page = entry; get_page(page); spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); @@ -442,9 +442,9 @@ restart: } return page; } - ret = lock_slot(mapping, slot); + entry = lock_slot(mapping, slot); spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); - return ret; + return entry; } void dax_wake_mapping_entry_waiter(struct address_space *mapping, @@ -469,11 +469,11 @@ void dax_wake_mapping_entry_waiter(struct address_space *mapping, void dax_unlock_mapping_entry(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index) { - void *ret, **slot; + void *entry, **slot; spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); - ret = __radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, index, NULL, &slot); - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret || !radix_tree_exceptional_entry(ret) || + entry = __radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, index, NULL, &slot); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!entry || !radix_tree_exceptional_entry(entry) || !slot_locked(mapping, slot))) { spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); return; -- 2.39.5