From e4a7da4a76137dab99b98ce126ec2837dd53f638 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 13:12:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [EBTABLES]: Deal with the worst-case behaviour in loop checks. No need to revisit a chain we'd already finished with during the check for current hook. It's either instant loop (which we'd just detected) or a duplicate work. Signed-off-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk --- net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c index 609d52065f48..12a57ae1cead 100644 --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c @@ -738,7 +738,9 @@ static int check_chainloops(struct ebt_entries *chain, struct ebt_cl_stack *cl_s BUGPRINT("loop\n"); return -1; } - /* this can't be 0, so the above test is correct */ + if (cl_s[i].hookmask & (1 << hooknr)) + goto letscontinue; + /* this can't be 0, so the loop test is correct */ cl_s[i].cs.n = pos + 1; pos = 0; cl_s[i].cs.e = ((void *)e + e->next_offset); -- 2.39.5