From e5f66eafe5a4c678965a2138b92b645c2c0c4d10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:44:54 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] PCI: Set ->mask_pos correctly The "+" operation has higher precedence than "?:" and ->msi_cap is always non-zero here so the original statement is equivalent to: entry->mask_pos = PCI_MSI_MASK_64; Which wasn't the intent. [bhelgaas: my fault from 78b5a310ce] Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas --- drivers/pci/msi.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c index d40bed726769..2c1075213bec 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c @@ -563,8 +563,10 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec) entry->msi_attrib.default_irq = dev->irq; /* Save IOAPIC IRQ */ entry->msi_attrib.pos = dev->msi_cap; - entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) ? - PCI_MSI_MASK_64 : PCI_MSI_MASK_32; + if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) + entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64; + else + entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32; /* All MSIs are unmasked by default, Mask them all */ if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit) pci_read_config_dword(dev, entry->mask_pos, &entry->masked); -- 2.39.5