From e8b532d48e5edeff580bc4fb7e66d0d862543aeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 23:41:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Rename skip_work to work_count The skip_work field in struct policy_dbs_info technically is a counter, so give it a new name to reflect that. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 14 +++++++------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c index 9c1dfcee0d57..a3001d8f34bb 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c @@ -196,16 +196,16 @@ static inline void gov_clear_update_util(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) static void gov_cancel_work(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs) { /* Tell dbs_update_util_handler() to skip queuing up work items. */ - atomic_inc(&policy_dbs->skip_work); + atomic_inc(&policy_dbs->work_count); /* * If dbs_update_util_handler() is already running, it may not notice - * the incremented skip_work, so wait for it to complete to prevent its + * the incremented work_count, so wait for it to complete to prevent its * work item from being queued up after the cancel_work_sync() below. */ gov_clear_update_util(policy_dbs->policy); irq_work_sync(&policy_dbs->irq_work); cancel_work_sync(&policy_dbs->work); - atomic_set(&policy_dbs->skip_work, 0); + atomic_set(&policy_dbs->work_count, 0); } static void dbs_work_handler(struct work_struct *work) @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static void dbs_work_handler(struct work_struct *work) * up using a stale sample delay value. */ smp_mb__before_atomic(); - atomic_dec(&policy_dbs->skip_work); + atomic_dec(&policy_dbs->work_count); } static void dbs_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work) @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void dbs_update_util_handler(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time, * - The governor is being stopped. * - It is too early (too little time from the previous sample). */ - if (atomic_inc_return(&policy_dbs->skip_work) == 1) { + if (atomic_inc_return(&policy_dbs->work_count) == 1) { u64 delta_ns; delta_ns = time - policy_dbs->last_sample_time; @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static void dbs_update_util_handler(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time, return; } } - atomic_dec(&policy_dbs->skip_work); + atomic_dec(&policy_dbs->work_count); } static void set_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static struct policy_dbs_info *alloc_policy_dbs_info(struct cpufreq_policy *poli return NULL; mutex_init(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex); - atomic_set(&policy_dbs->skip_work, 0); + atomic_set(&policy_dbs->work_count, 0); init_irq_work(&policy_dbs->irq_work, dbs_irq_work); INIT_WORK(&policy_dbs->work, dbs_work_handler); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h index 95e6834d36a8..37537220e48c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ struct policy_dbs_info { u64 last_sample_time; s64 sample_delay_ns; - atomic_t skip_work; + atomic_t work_count; struct irq_work irq_work; struct work_struct work; /* dbs_data may be shared between multiple policy objects */ -- 2.39.5