From e9d65725bdf5954283625ca4d770bfc34f2ae56a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Li Zefan Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:39:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: Fix missing entries in /proc/lock_chains Two entries are missing in the output of /proc/lock_chains. One is chains[1]. When lc_next() is called the 1st time, chains[0] is returned. And when it's called the 2nd time, chains[2] is returned. The other missing ons is, when lc_start() is called the 2nd time, we should start from chains[@pos-1] but not chains[@pos], because pos == 0 is the header. Signed-off-by: Li Zefan Cc: Peter Zijlstra LKML-Reference: <4A88ED25.2040306@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/lockdep_proc.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/lockdep_proc.c index 5dbe30b4e591..9a7996e371f5 100644 --- a/kernel/lockdep_proc.c +++ b/kernel/lockdep_proc.c @@ -160,8 +160,8 @@ static void *lc_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos) else { chain = v; - if (*pos < nr_lock_chains) - chain = lock_chains + *pos; + if (*pos - 1 < nr_lock_chains) + chain = lock_chains + (*pos - 1); else chain = NULL; } @@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ static void *lc_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) if (*pos == 0) return SEQ_START_TOKEN; - if (*pos < nr_lock_chains) - return lock_chains + *pos; + if (*pos - 1 < nr_lock_chains) + return lock_chains + (*pos - 1); return NULL; } -- 2.39.5