From eadb188c780f0d02bf2f828191cb8d2917ef3d8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xenia Ragiadakou Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 07:29:05 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192u: fix spaces around for and while in r819xU_phy.c This patch fixes whitespace around 'for' and 'while' following the linux kernel coding style conventions. Signed-off-by: Xenia Ragiadakou Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c index c5fe552ce4a7..1dceac4bcd6b 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ void rtl8192_phy_configmac(struct net_device *dev) dwArrayLen = MACPHY_ArrayLength; pdwArray = rtl819XMACPHY_Array; } - for(i = 0; i%s(), CheckBlock:%d\n", __FUNCTION__, CheckBlock); - for(i=0 ; i < CheckTimes ; i++) { + for (i=0 ; i < CheckTimes ; i++) { // // Write Data to register and readback @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ void rtl8192_BB_Config_ParaFile(struct net_device *dev) /*----Ckeck FPGAPHY0 and PHY1 board is OK----*/ // TODO: this function should be removed on ASIC , Emily 2007.2.2 - for(eCheckItem=(HW90_BLOCK_E)HW90_BLOCK_PHY0; eCheckItem<=HW90_BLOCK_PHY1; eCheckItem++) { + for (eCheckItem=(HW90_BLOCK_E)HW90_BLOCK_PHY0; eCheckItem<=HW90_BLOCK_PHY1; eCheckItem++) { rtStatus = rtl8192_phy_checkBBAndRF(dev, (HW90_BLOCK_E)eCheckItem, (RF90_RADIO_PATH_E)0); //don't care RF path if (rtStatus != 0) { RT_TRACE((COMP_ERR | COMP_PHY), "PHY_RF8256_Config():Check PHY%d Fail!!\n", eCheckItem-1); @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ u8 rtl8192_phy_ConfigRFWithHeaderFile(struct net_device *dev, RF90_RADIO_PATH_E switch (eRFPath) { case RF90_PATH_A: - for(i = 0;iPara1, (u8)CurrentCmd->Para2); break; case CmdID_RF_WriteReg: - for(eRFPath = 0; eRFPath < RF90_PATH_MAX; eRFPath++) { + for (eRFPath = 0; eRFPath < RF90_PATH_MAX; eRFPath++) { rtl8192_phy_SetRFReg(dev, (RF90_RADIO_PATH_E)eRFPath, CurrentCmd->Para1, bZebra1_ChannelNum, CurrentCmd->Para2); } break; @@ -1304,7 +1304,7 @@ u8 rtl8192_phy_SwChnlStepByStep(struct net_device *dev, u8 channel, u8 *stage, u } break; - } while(true); + } while (true); // }/*for(Number of RF paths)*/ (*delay)=CurrentCmd->msDelay; @@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ void rtl8192_phy_FinishSwChnlNow(struct net_device *dev, u8 channel) struct r8192_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev); u32 delay = 0; - while(!rtl8192_phy_SwChnlStepByStep(dev,channel,&priv->SwChnlStage,&priv->SwChnlStep,&delay)) { + while (!rtl8192_phy_SwChnlStepByStep(dev,channel,&priv->SwChnlStage,&priv->SwChnlStep,&delay)) { // if(delay>0) // msleep(delay);//or mdelay? need further consideration if (!priv->up) -- 2.39.5