From eb3efa1249b6413be930bdf13d10b6238028a440 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Chinner Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:42:57 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] xfs: clean up xfs_ail_delete() xfs_ail_delete() has a needlessly complex interface. It returns the log item that was passed in for deletion (which the callers then assert is identical to the one passed in), and callers of xfs_ail_delete() still need to invalidate current traversal cursors. Make xfs_ail_delete() return void, move the cursor invalidation inside it, and clean up the callers just to use the log item pointer they passed in. While cleaning up, remove the messy and unnecessary "/* ARGUSED */" comments around all these functions. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c | 27 +++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c index dc9069568ff7..645928cab42d 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ #include "xfs_error.h" STATIC void xfs_ail_insert(struct xfs_ail *, xfs_log_item_t *); -STATIC xfs_log_item_t * xfs_ail_delete(struct xfs_ail *, xfs_log_item_t *); +STATIC void xfs_ail_delete(struct xfs_ail *, xfs_log_item_t *); STATIC xfs_log_item_t * xfs_ail_min(struct xfs_ail *); STATIC xfs_log_item_t * xfs_ail_next(struct xfs_ail *, xfs_log_item_t *); @@ -468,16 +468,13 @@ xfs_trans_ail_update( xfs_log_item_t *lip, xfs_lsn_t lsn) __releases(ailp->xa_lock) { - xfs_log_item_t *dlip = NULL; xfs_log_item_t *mlip; /* ptr to minimum lip */ xfs_lsn_t tail_lsn; mlip = xfs_ail_min(ailp); if (lip->li_flags & XFS_LI_IN_AIL) { - dlip = xfs_ail_delete(ailp, lip); - ASSERT(dlip == lip); - xfs_trans_ail_cursor_clear(ailp, dlip); + xfs_ail_delete(ailp, lip); } else { lip->li_flags |= XFS_LI_IN_AIL; } @@ -485,7 +482,7 @@ xfs_trans_ail_update( lip->li_lsn = lsn; xfs_ail_insert(ailp, lip); - if (mlip == dlip) { + if (mlip == lip) { mlip = xfs_ail_min(ailp); /* * It is not safe to access mlip after the AIL lock is @@ -524,21 +521,18 @@ xfs_trans_ail_delete( struct xfs_ail *ailp, xfs_log_item_t *lip) __releases(ailp->xa_lock) { - xfs_log_item_t *dlip; xfs_log_item_t *mlip; xfs_lsn_t tail_lsn; if (lip->li_flags & XFS_LI_IN_AIL) { mlip = xfs_ail_min(ailp); - dlip = xfs_ail_delete(ailp, lip); - ASSERT(dlip == lip); - xfs_trans_ail_cursor_clear(ailp, dlip); + xfs_ail_delete(ailp, lip); lip->li_flags &= ~XFS_LI_IN_AIL; lip->li_lsn = 0; - if (mlip == dlip) { + if (mlip == lip) { mlip = xfs_ail_min(ailp); /* * It is not safe to access mlip after the AIL lock @@ -632,7 +626,6 @@ STATIC void xfs_ail_insert( struct xfs_ail *ailp, xfs_log_item_t *lip) -/* ARGSUSED */ { xfs_log_item_t *next_lip; @@ -661,18 +654,14 @@ xfs_ail_insert( /* * Delete the given item from the AIL. Return a pointer to the item. */ -/*ARGSUSED*/ -STATIC xfs_log_item_t * +STATIC void xfs_ail_delete( struct xfs_ail *ailp, xfs_log_item_t *lip) -/* ARGSUSED */ { xfs_ail_check(ailp, lip); - list_del(&lip->li_ail); - - return lip; + xfs_trans_ail_cursor_clear(ailp, lip); } /* @@ -682,7 +671,6 @@ xfs_ail_delete( STATIC xfs_log_item_t * xfs_ail_min( struct xfs_ail *ailp) -/* ARGSUSED */ { if (list_empty(&ailp->xa_ail)) return NULL; @@ -699,7 +687,6 @@ STATIC xfs_log_item_t * xfs_ail_next( struct xfs_ail *ailp, xfs_log_item_t *lip) -/* ARGSUSED */ { if (lip->li_ail.next == &ailp->xa_ail) return NULL; -- 2.39.5