From f53dd63f1119a98a16d1a5a7cb3277a2f1ff483d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Imre Deak Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:37:32 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/hsw: Avoid early timeout during LCPLL disable/restore Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by using the non-atomic wait_for instead. Fixes: 0351b93992aa ("drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic timeout granularity") CC: Chris Wilson CC: Tvrtko Ursulin Signed-off-by: Imre Deak Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin CC: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467110253-16046-4-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 0312472711cc..d902a70edb84 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -9534,8 +9534,8 @@ static void hsw_disable_lcpll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, val |= LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK; I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val); - if (wait_for_atomic_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) & - LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 1)) + if (wait_for_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) & + LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 1)) DRM_ERROR("Switching to FCLK failed\n"); val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL); @@ -9608,8 +9608,8 @@ static void hsw_restore_lcpll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) val &= ~LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK; I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val); - if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) & - LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE) == 0, 1)) + if (wait_for_us((I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) & + LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE) == 0, 1)) DRM_ERROR("Switching back to LCPLL failed\n"); } -- 2.39.5