From fc4b3fa714fb2a078531bccb501cf2ef8c7f888a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans-Frieder Vogt Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 13:56:47 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] [media] rtl2832.c: minor cleanup The current formulation of the bw_params loop uses the counter j as an index for the first dimension of the bw_params array which is later incremented by the variable i. It is evaluated correctly only, because j is initialized to 0 at the beginning of the loop. I think that explicitly using the index 0 better reflects the intent of the expression. Signed-off-by: Hans-Frieder Vogt Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab --- drivers/media/dvb/frontends/rtl2832.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/rtl2832.c b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/rtl2832.c index 2da592fb38ad..28269ccaeab7 100644 --- a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/rtl2832.c +++ b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/rtl2832.c @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static int rtl2832_set_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe) return -EINVAL; } - for (j = 0; j < sizeof(bw_params[j]); j++) { + for (j = 0; j < sizeof(bw_params[0]); j++) { ret = rtl2832_wr_regs(priv, 0x1c+j, 1, &bw_params[i][j], 1); if (ret) goto err; -- 2.39.5