From fe271c02b72c32f59f59181f858e637c7d812592 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Alex,Shi" Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:43:07 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] kswapd: assign new_order and new_classzone_idx after wakeup in sleeping MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit There 2 places to read pgdat in kswapd. One is return from a successful balance, another is waked up from kswapd sleeping. The new_order and new_classzone_idx represent the balance input order and classzone_idx. But current new_order and new_classzone_idx are not assigned after kswapd_try_to_sleep(), that will cause a bug in the following scenario. 1: after a successful balance, kswapd goes to sleep, and new_order = 0; new_classzone_idx = __MAX_NR_ZONES - 1; 2: kswapd waked up with order = 3 and classzone_idx = ZONE_NORMAL 3: in the balance_pgdat() running, a new balance wakeup happened with order = 5, and classzone_idx = ZONE_NORMAL 4: the first wakeup(order = 3) finished successufly, return order = 3 but, the new_order is still 0, so, this balancing will be treated as a failed balance. And then the second tighter balancing will be missed. So, to avoid the above problem, the new_order and new_classzone_idx need to be assigned for later successful comparison. Signed-off-by: Alex Shi Acked-by: Mel Gorman Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim Tested-by: Pádraig Brady Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/vmscan.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index ec83496ff754..f94eb0b628f0 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -2870,6 +2870,8 @@ static int kswapd(void *p) balanced_classzone_idx); order = pgdat->kswapd_max_order; classzone_idx = pgdat->classzone_idx; + new_order = order; + new_classzone_idx = classzone_idx; pgdat->kswapd_max_order = 0; pgdat->classzone_idx = pgdat->nr_zones - 1; } -- 2.39.5