From ffd71da4e3f323b7673b061e6f7e0d0c12dc2b49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Molnar Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:54:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] panic: decrease oops_in_progress only after having done the panic Impact: eliminate secondary warnings during panic() We can panic() in a number of difficult, atomic contexts, hence we use bust_spinlocks(1) in panic() to increase oops_in_progress, which prevents various debug checks we have in place. But in practice this protection only covers the first few printk's done by panic() - it does not cover the later attempt to stop all other CPUs and kexec(). If a secondary warning triggers in one of those facilities that can make the panic message scroll off. So do bust_spinlocks(0) only much later in panic(). (which code is only reached if panic policy is relaxed that it can return after a warning message) Reported-by: Jan Beulich LKML-Reference: <49B91A7E.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/panic.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c index 32fe4eff1b89..57fb005de546 100644 --- a/kernel/panic.c +++ b/kernel/panic.c @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...) #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE dump_stack(); #endif - bust_spinlocks(0); /* * If we have crashed and we have a crash kernel loaded let it handle @@ -136,6 +135,7 @@ NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...) mdelay(1); i++; } + bust_spinlocks(0); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(panic); -- 2.39.5