From 9eeb52ae712e72141c4c1d173048a606ba8f42f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Akinobu Mita Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 15:23:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fault-inject: fix wrong should_fail() decision in task context Commit 1203c8e6fb0a ("fault-inject: simplify access check for fail-nth") unintentionally broke a conditional statement in should_fail(). Any faults are not injected in the task context by the change when the systematic fault injection is not used. This change restores to the previous correct behaviour. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1501633700-3488-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com Fixes: 1203c8e6fb0a ("fault-inject: simplify access check for fail-nth") Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita Reported-by: Lu Fengqi Tested-by: Lu Fengqi Cc: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- lib/fault-inject.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/fault-inject.c b/lib/fault-inject.c index 7d315fdb9f13..cf7b129b0b2b 100644 --- a/lib/fault-inject.c +++ b/lib/fault-inject.c @@ -110,10 +110,12 @@ bool should_fail(struct fault_attr *attr, ssize_t size) if (in_task()) { unsigned int fail_nth = READ_ONCE(current->fail_nth); - if (fail_nth && !WRITE_ONCE(current->fail_nth, fail_nth - 1)) - goto fail; + if (fail_nth) { + if (!WRITE_ONCE(current->fail_nth, fail_nth - 1)) + goto fail; - return false; + return false; + } } /* No need to check any other properties if the probability is 0 */ -- 2.39.2