If somebody is touching data too early, it might be easier to diagnose a

problem when dereferencing NULL at mem->info.nodeinfo[node] than trying to
understand why mem_cgroup_per_zone is [un|partly]initialized.

Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 9b58bcd3490e02dcedcc9d968b84c4109b55f3c8..3f7b00cd0dcf55fa55c251c37e323424579c9ef8 100644 (file)
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -4743,7 +4743,6 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int node)
        if (!pn)
                return 1;
 
-       memcg->info.nodeinfo[node] = pn;
        for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
                mz = &pn->zoneinfo[zone];
                for_each_lru(l)
@@ -4752,6 +4751,7 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int node)
                mz->on_tree = false;
                mz->mem = memcg;
        }
+       memcg->info.nodeinfo[node] = pn;
        return 0;
 }